Thursday, January 26, 2017
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Capstone Experimental Component
Students will be asked to design and perform an original experiment. The purpose of this experiment was for students to gather data about their topic using their own methods and those learned in science.
Students will be asked to be as clear as possible, but to be sure that they include all the steps of the scientific method
(Question, Hypothesis, Design, Test, Record, Analyze, Conclude)
and all the parts of a standard lab report
(Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Materials, Data, Graphs, Discussion, Works Cited)
How do I know if I have a good experiment?
Students will be asked to be as clear as possible, but to be sure that they include all the steps of the scientific method
(Question, Hypothesis, Design, Test, Record, Analyze, Conclude)
and all the parts of a standard lab report
(Abstract, Introduction, Methods and Materials, Data, Graphs, Discussion, Works Cited)
How do I know if I have a good experiment?
Do you have a question?
Do you have a hypothesis?
Hypothesis OK (relational) – I predict that they will be related
Hypothesis BETTER (directional) – I predict that as this thing increases, the other thing will decrease
Do you know what kind of experiment you are doing?
Case Study
Survey
Research
Observational
Research
Correlational
Research
Experimental
Research
Cross
Cultural Research
Secondary
Analysis
- Do you know the differences? Scroll down for more info.
Do you know what variables you are working with?
Independent
Dependent
Controlled
Are your results clear?
Thorough
Measurable
Graphs and
Tables
Easy to
Understand
Is your Conclusion accurate?
Controlled
Related
Is your experiment repeatable?
Stay away from vague data.
Make sure your data has plenty of points.
Does the report explain any uncontrolled aspects of the
study?
How do I come up with a good question?
How does this thing affect the other thing?
Sample Experiment questions:
Does music affect on
animal behavior?
• Does the color of
food or drinks affect whether or not we like them?
• Where are the most
germs in your school?
• Does music have an
affect on plant growth?
• Which kind of food
do dogs (or any animal) prefer best?
• Which paper towel
brand is the strongest?
• What is the best
way to keep an ice cube from melting?
• What level of salt
works best to hatch brine shrimp?
• Can the food we eat
affect our heart rate?
• How effective are
child-proof containers and locks.
• Can background
noise levels affect how well we concentrate?
• Does acid rain
affect the growth of aquatic plants?
• What is the best
way to keep cut flowers fresh the longest?
• Does the color of
light used on plants affect how well they grow?
• What plant
fertilizer works best?
• Does the color of a
room affect human behavior?
• Do athletic
students have better lung capacity?
• What brand of
battery lasts the longest?
• Does the type of
potting soil used in planting affect how fast the plant grows?
• What type of food
allow mold to grow the fastest?
• Does having worms
in soil help plants grow faster?
• Can plants grow in
pots if they are sideways or upside down?
• Does the color of
hair affect how much static electricity it can carry? (test with balloons)
• How much weight can
the surface tension of water hold?
• Can some people
really read someone else’s thoughts?
• Which soda decays
fallen out teeth the most?
• What light
brightness makes plants grow the best?
• Does the color of
birdseed affect how much birds will eat it?
• Do natural or
chemical fertilizers work best?
• Can mice learn?
(you can pick any animal)
• Can people tell
artificial smells from real ones?
• What brands of
bubble gum produce the biggest bubbles?
• Does age affect
human reaction times?
• What is the effect
of salt on the boiling temperature of water?
• Does shoe design
really affect an athlete’s jumping height?
• What type of grass
seed grows the fastest?
• Can animals see in
the dark better than humans?
The above list is primarily Experimental What are the other types of experiments?
Sociologists use many
different designs and methods to study society and social behavior. Most
sociological research involves ethnography, or “field work” designed to depict the characteristics of
a population as fully as possible.
Three popular social research designs(models) are
- Cross‐sectional, in which
scientists study a number of individuals of different ages who have the
same trait or characteristic of interest at a single time
- Example: How many women have breast cancer? Researcher would check with many
different ages, backgrounds etc. to see what percentages showed up in
each area.
- Longitudinal, in which
scientists study the same individuals or society repeatedly over a
specified period of time
- Example: How does sugar affect health? Researcher follows a smaller group of people
to see how they change over time.
- Cross‐sequential, in which
scientists test individuals in a cross‐sectional sample more than once
over a specified period of time
- Example: How does height affect success in
sports? Researcher follows several
different groups to see how they all change over time.
Six of the most popular sociological research methods (procedures)
are the case study, survey, observational, correlational, experimental, and cross‐cultural methods,
as well as working with information already available.
Case study research
In case study research, an investigator studies an individual
or small group of individuals with an unusual condition or situation. Case
studies are typically clinical in scope. The investigator (often a clinical
sociologist) sometimes uses self‐report measures to acquire quantifiable data on the subject.
A comprehensive case study, including a long‐term follow‐up,
can last months or years.
On the positive side, case studies obtain useful information about
individuals and small groups. On the negative side, they tend to apply only to
individuals with similar characteristics rather than to the general population.
The high likelihood of the investigator's biases affecting subjects' responses
limits the generalizability of this method.
Survey research
Survey research involves interviewing or
administering questionnaires, or written surveys, to large
numbers of people. The investigator analyzes the data obtained from surveys
to learn about similarities, differences, and trends. He or she then makes
predictions about the population being studied.
As with most research methods, survey research brings both
advantages and disadvantages. Advantages include obtaining information from a
large number of respondents, conducting personal interviews at a time
convenient for respondents, and acquiring data as inexpensively as possible.
“Mail‐in” surveys have the added advantage of ensuring anonymity and thus
prompting respondents to answer questions truthfully.
Disadvantages of survey research include volunteer bias,
interviewer bias, and distortion. Volunteer bias occurs
when a sample of volunteers is not representative of the general population.
Subjects who are willing to talk about certain topics may answer surveys
differently than those who are not willing to talk. Interviewer bias occurs
when an interviewer's expectations or insignificant gestures (for example,
frowning or smiling) inadvertently influence a subject's responses one way or
the other. Distortion occurs when a subject does not respond
to questions honestly.
Observational research
Because distortion can be a serious
limitation of surveys, observational
research involves
directly observing subjects' reactions, either in a laboratory (called laboratory observation) or in a natural setting (called naturalistic observation). Observational research reduces the
possibility that subjects will not give totally honest accounts of the
experiences, not take the study seriously, fail to remember, or feel
embarrassed.
Observational research has limitations, however. Subject bias is
common, because volunteer subjects may not be representative of the general
public. Individuals who agree to observation and monitoring may function
differently than those who do not. They may also function differently in a
laboratory setting than they do in other settings.
Correlational research
A sociologist may also conduct correlational research. A correlation is a relationship between
two variables (or “factors that change”). These
factors can be characteristics, attitudes, behaviors, or events. Correlational
research attempts to determine if a relationship exists between the two
variables, and the degree of that relationship.
A social researcher can use case studies, surveys, interviews, and
observational research to discover correlations. Correlations are either positive
(to +1.0), negative (to −1.0), or nonexistent (0.0). In a positive correlation,
the values of the variables increase or decrease (“co‐vary”) together. In a
negative correlation, one variable increases as the other decreases. In a
nonexistent correlation, no relationship exists between the variables.
People commonly confuse correlation with causation. Correlational
data do not indicate cause‐and‐effect relationships. When a
correlation exists, changes in the value of one variable reflect changes in the
value of the other. The correlation does not imply that one variable causes the
other, only that both variables somehow relate to one another. To study the
effects that variables have on each other, an investigator must conduct an
experiment.
Experimental research
Experimental research attempts to determine how and why something
happens. Experimental research tests the way in which an independent variable (the factor that the scientist
manipulates) affects a dependent
variable (the factor
that the scientist observes).
A number of factors can affect the outcome of any type of
experimental research. One is finding samples that are random and
representative of the population being studied. Another is experimenter
bias, in which the researcher's expectations about what should or should
not happen in the study sway the results. Still another is controlling
for extraneous variables, such as room temperature or noise level,
that may interfere with the results of the experiment. Only when the
experimenter carefully controls for extraneous variables can she or he draw
valid conclusions about the effects of specific variables on other variables.
Cross-cultural research
Sensitivity to others' norms, folkways,
values, mores, attitudes, customs, and practices necessitates knowledge of
other societies and cultures. Sociologists may conduct cross‐cultural research, or research designed to reveal
variations across different groups of people. Most cross‐cultural research involves survey,
direct observation, and participant observation methods of research.
Participant observation requires
that an “observer” become a member of his or her subjects' community. An
advantage of this method of research is the opportunity it provides to study
what actually occurs within a community, and then consider that information
within the political, economic, social, and religious systems of that
community. Cross‐cultural research demonstrates that Western cultural standards
do not necessarily apply to other societies. What may be “normal” or acceptable
for one group may be “abnormal” or unacceptable for another.
Research with existing data, or secondary analysis
Some sociologists conduct research by
using data that other social scientists have already collected. The use of
publicly accessible information is known as secondary analysis, and is most common in situations in
which collecting new data is impractical or unnecessary. Sociologists may
obtain statistical data for analysis from businesses, academic institutions,
and governmental agencies, to name only a few sources. Or they may use
historical or library information to generate their hypotheses.
Variables
You won't be able to do very much in research
unless you know how to talk about variables. A variable is any
entity that can take on different values. OK, so what does that
mean? Anything that can vary can be considered a variable. For instance, age can be considered a variable
because age can take different values for different people or for the same
person at different times. Similarly, country can
be considered a variable because a person's country can be assigned a value.
Variables aren't always 'quantitative' or
numerical. The variable 'city' consists of text values like 'New York' or
'Sydney'. We can, if it is useful, assign quantitative values instead of (or in
place of) the text values, but we don't have to assign numbers in order for
something to be a variable. It's also important to realize that variables
aren't only things that we measure in the traditional sense. For instance, in
much social research and in program evaluation, we consider the treatment or
program to be made up of one or more variables (i.e., the 'cause' can be
considered a variable). An educational program can have varying amounts of
'time on task', 'classroom settings', 'student-teacher ratios', and so on. So
even the program can be considered a variable (which can be made up of a number
of sub-variables).
An attribute is a specific value on a variable. For
instance, the variable sex or gender has two attributes: male and female. Or, the variable agreement might be defined as having five
attributes:
- 1 = strongly disagree
- 2 = disagree
- 3 = neutral
- 4 = agree
- 5 = strongly agree
Another important distinction having to do with
the term 'variable' is the distinction between an independent and dependent variable.
This distinction is particularly relevant when you are investigating
cause-effect relationships. It took me the longest time to learn this
distinction. (Of course, I'm someone who gets confused about the signs for
'arrivals' and 'departures' at airports -- do I go to arrivals because I'm
arriving at the airport or does the person I'm picking up go to arrivals
because they're arriving on the plane!). I originally thought that an
independent variable was one that would be free to vary or respond to some
program or treatment, and that a dependent variable must be one that depends on my efforts (that is, it's the treatment).
But this is entirely backwards! In fact the independent variable is what you (or nature)
manipulates -- a
treatment or program or cause. The dependent variable is what is affected by the
independent variable --
your effects or outcomes. For example, if you are studying the effects of a new
educational program on student achievement, the program is the independent
variable and your measures of achievement are the dependent ones.
Finally, there are two traits of variables that
should always be achieved. Each variable should be exhaustive,
it should include all possible answerable responses. For instance, if the
variable is "religion" and the only options are
"Protestant", "Jewish", and "Muslim", there are
quite a few religions I can think of that haven't been included. The list does
not exhaust all possibilities. On the other hand, if you exhaust all the
possibilities with some variables -- religion being one of them -- you would
simply have too many responses. The way to deal with this is to explicitly list
the most common attributes and then use a general category like
"Other" to account for all remaining ones. In addition to being
exhaustive, the attributes of a variable should be mutually
exclusive, no respondent should be able to have two attributes
simultaneously. While this might seem obvious, it is often rather tricky in
practice. For instance, you might be tempted to represent the variable "Employment
Status" with the two attributes "employed" and
"unemployed." But these attributes are not necessarily mutually
exclusive -- a person who is looking for a second job while employed would be
able to check both attributes! But don't we often use questions on surveys that
ask the respondent to "check all that apply" and then list a series
of categories? Yes, we do, but technically speaking, each of the categories in
a question like that is its own variable and is treated dichotomously as either
"checked" or "unchecked", attributes that are mutually exclusive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)